Policy Choices for Measuring Student Learning
There's simply no widely available set of learning quality measures that the Department could possibly draw on.
Big ideas, bold solutions. Explore the latest research, analysis, and policy insights from our experts.
There's simply no widely available set of learning quality measures that the Department could possibly draw on.
This blog post is the third and final installment in a series by Julianna Lord, Emerson National Hunger Fellow.
In the world of early education policy, we debate the merits of “half-day” versus “full-day” pre-K and kindergarten.
Even as digital tools threaten to render textbooks obsolete, our textbook policies may yet haunt the quality of instructional materials.
Observers of early childhood education in the U.S. would be hard-pressed to find much evidence that the country has any system at all.
Focusing on the importance of the full- and half-day labels is not an abstract, academic exercise. Such labels have consequences.
As states turn to more Pre-K programs, Head Start, which serves more the a million under privileged kids, is being left behind.
The national average for total hours in a public school year is 1,195.
The Common Core State Standards are less exciting than you've heard. But they're still worth implementing.
You may be wondering: What is the link between home visiting and children learning to read?
It's hard to gauge what the level and pace of enrollment in the IBR and PAYE programs ought to be.
Editor's Note: This post, which was originally published on the New America NYC blog, provides a summary of an Asset Building Program event
The event, "Seizing Opportunity in the Digital Age," put a spotlight on the difficulties of incorporating ed tech into classrooms.